ALT_IMG

Codex: Yes to Malnutrition

Our thanks go to the National Health Federation and Scott Tips for his shattering report on the recent CODEX deliberations in Germany. You should too.As these government directed pundits go you see for the most part that not only do they have no understanding of nutrients and nutrition Readmore...

ALT_IMG

UDOH Looking flr People Ready to Quit Tobacco

The Utah Department of Health (UDOH) today released the Utah Hospital Comparison Report, 2011. Utahns can use the report to access important information on all Utah hospitals regarding quality and patient safety measures that include:1. Rates of accidental lacerations and punctures;2. Death rates for diagnoses that should rarely result in death (e.g., hip dislocation, cesarean delivery);3 Readmore..

Alt img

How fruit and veg can beat breast cancer

London Nutritionist Yvonne Bishop-Weston said today "New laws forbid nutritionists to say or do anything that may encourage patients to forgo their standard treatment and seek an alternative treatment or even a diet so it's hard to honestly and freely comment on these studies"t Readmore...

Showing posts with label vaccines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label vaccines. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Fluoride and Vaccine Failures

0 comments
http://bit.ly/K2a9or FMI
I am sure Mary Selecky, the Washington State Department of Health Secretary, has made no effort to keep up with the facts about vaccines, their toxins, their risk to health, and the options that should be made available to parents as she continues to hawk "Get a Shot" in reaction to the whooping couch outbreak among already vaccinated children. You need this, she says, because the shots wear off.

I am sure Mary also is blind to the damage caused by fluoride as it is forced on thousands of Washington State citizens without their permission in the form of toxic and heavy metal laden fertilizer waste provided by Cargill.

No Mary, fluoride does not truly prevent cavities.  Fluoride also causes fluorosis that impacts teeth and your skeleton.  Fluoride based osteoporosis drugs are implicated in jaw necrosis and now even ADA dentists primed to push this poison on patients are screening for it in the new patient health history form.  Gee, do you think they can connect the dots?

Now, just a week or so after I had a nice talk with a grandmother about the risk of the pertussis shot, I got a great and welcome surprise from JAMA. I was explaining to the grandmother that the nurse who told her daughter in law it was safe to get a pertussis shot while pregnant as it will also help protect the baby is grossly misinforming her, and risking not only her health but that of her baby.

The insanity just seems to get worse by the day, and Selecky's department continues to cover up its own fraud and record destruction to avoid exposing their attack on me for blowing the whistle on insurance fraud, medical record fabrication and extreme patient safety issues . The evidence is compelling.  One of the best pieces is their disregard for factual information they have on my 1977 application for license by endorsement. But this is for another story on another day.

I wrote about how vitamin C can be helpful to parents in this whooping cough situation because I care about public health, something I do not see from WA DOH.  That information is here. There is a legal requirement for any health provider to provide you with both sides of the story, something WA DOH has not done for decades, and probably so have other states and health providers.

While we hear about malaria vaccines and drugs failing Bill Gates continues to push this agenda.  We don't hear about the benefits of vitamin A for this or pneumonia.

While we hear now - at last - about the fraud in medical research -

Critics who deplore the commercialization of medical research have raised concerns about scientific fraud and misconduct that are undermining the integrity of the medical-scientific literature, and the practice of "evidence-based medicine"--- which relies on published journal reports. Recent analyses of retractions of published peer-reviewed journal reports provide supportive evidence for those critics.


Now we have the AMA reporting in its very own publication about the problem with immune suppression and fluoride.  And yes, the outcome is vaccine failure.

Looks like you might not need that extra shot after all.

And to be sure, for the Benton County(WA) Health Department head that did not reply to my correspondence to her, she should know that not all the information found on the internet is questionable.  Does she forget that FDA and CDC are on the internet too, just like the WA DOH.

Should we be trusting what they say?

From Natural Health News

Vaccine does not stop pneumonia
Continue reading →

Fluoride and Vaccine Failures

0 comments
http://bit.ly/K2a9or FMI
I am sure Mary Selecky, the Washington State Department of Health Secretary, has made no effort to keep up with the facts about vaccines, their toxins, their risk to health, and the options that should be made available to parents as she continues to hawk "Get a Shot" in reaction to the whooping couch outbreak among already vaccinated children. You need this, she says, because the shots wear off.

I am sure Mary also is blind to the damage caused by fluoride as it is forced on thousands of Washington State citizens without their permission in the form of toxic and heavy metal laden fertilizer waste provided by Cargill.

No Mary, fluoride does not truly prevent cavities.  Fluoride also causes fluorosis that impacts teeth and your skeleton.  Fluoride based osteoporosis drugs are implicated in jaw necrosis and now even ADA dentists primed to push this poison on patients are screening for it in the new patient health history form.  Gee, do you think they can connect the dots?

Now, just a week or so after I had a nice talk with a grandmother about the risk of the pertussis shot, I got a great and welcome surprise from JAMA. I was explaining to the grandmother that the nurse who told her daughter in law it was safe to get a pertussis shot while pregnant as it will also help protect the baby is grossly misinforming her, and risking not only her health but that of her baby.

The insanity just seems to get worse by the day, and Selecky's department continues to cover up its own fraud and record destruction to avoid exposing their attack on me for blowing the whistle on insurance fraud, medical record fabrication and extreme patient safety issues . The evidence is compelling.  One of the best pieces is their disregard for factual information they have on my 1977 application for license by endorsement. But this is for another story on another day.

I wrote about how vitamin C can be helpful to parents in this whooping cough situation because I care about public health, something I do not see from WA DOH.  That information is here. There is a legal requirement for any health provider to provide you with both sides of the story, something WA DOH has not done for decades, and probably so have other states and health providers.

While we hear about malaria vaccines and drugs failing Bill Gates continues to push this agenda.  We don't hear about the benefits of vitamin A for this or pneumonia.

While we hear now - at last - about the fraud in medical research -

Critics who deplore the commercialization of medical research have raised concerns about scientific fraud and misconduct that are undermining the integrity of the medical-scientific literature, and the practice of "evidence-based medicine"--- which relies on published journal reports. Recent analyses of retractions of published peer-reviewed journal reports provide supportive evidence for those critics.


Now we have the AMA reporting in its very own publication about the problem with immune suppression and fluoride.  And yes, the outcome is vaccine failure.

Looks like you might not need that extra shot after all.

And to be sure, for the Benton County(WA) Health Department head that did not reply to my correspondence to her, she should know that not all the information found on the internet is questionable.  Does she forget that FDA and CDC are on the internet too, just like the WA DOH.

Should we be trusting what they say?

From Natural Health News

Vaccine does not stop pneumonia
Continue reading →
Sunday, December 11, 2011

ALL VACCINES ARE CONTAMINATED

0 comments
"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination" - Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital

Vaccines
Experts say families need to take a critical look at vaccines.
(WASHINGTON, D.C.) - Have you been rushing out to get a yearly flu vaccine or diligently taking your children for the 40 or so mandated childhood vaccines?

That's really a shame because you have unwittingly been trading a run-of-the-mill flu or just the measles, for loading up your or your children's bodies with cancer and other deadly viruses, a destructive bacteria, a chemical selected to damage fertility, and with synthetic DNA that threatens to damage your own DNA - the biologic code for your existence.

Who is saying the vaccines are contaminated?


All the vaccines mandated to children and many other vaccines as well, including the seasonal flu vaccines being mandated to health care workers, are contaminated with polysorbate 80, the central ingredient in a pharmaceutical industry patent to damage fertility. 


Read more
Continue reading →

ALL VACCINES ARE CONTAMINATED

0 comments
"The chief, if not the sole, cause of the monstrous increase in cancer has been vaccination" - Dr. Robert Bell, once Vice President International Society for Cancer Research at the British Cancer Hospital

Vaccines
Experts say families need to take a critical look at vaccines.
(WASHINGTON, D.C.) - Have you been rushing out to get a yearly flu vaccine or diligently taking your children for the 40 or so mandated childhood vaccines?

That's really a shame because you have unwittingly been trading a run-of-the-mill flu or just the measles, for loading up your or your children's bodies with cancer and other deadly viruses, a destructive bacteria, a chemical selected to damage fertility, and with synthetic DNA that threatens to damage your own DNA - the biologic code for your existence.

Who is saying the vaccines are contaminated?


All the vaccines mandated to children and many other vaccines as well, including the seasonal flu vaccines being mandated to health care workers, are contaminated with polysorbate 80, the central ingredient in a pharmaceutical industry patent to damage fertility. 


Read more
Continue reading →
Saturday, October 29, 2011

Heard it First on NHN - Gardasil for Boys

0 comments
Natural Health News has been convering Gardsil and the issue surrounding Gardsil for boys and men since 2006 and early in 2008.  You can be sure to get the first reports of real health and natural health news at Natural Health News, frequently copied, never duplicated.
 
 
ask us about remedies for vaccine concerns
 
Jun 30, 2006
Merck says that this vaccine, at $360 a series, will not have data on vaccination of little boys until 2008. Of course adding to the already heavy overlay of harmful vaccines will do little but raise money for Merck in the meantime. The Feds are also boosting profits by ... NVIC maintains that Merck's clinical trials did not prove the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts is safe to give to young girls. ...

Some of our top stories about Gardasil -

Oct 16, 2009
Merck now targeting men with Gardasil, boys weren't enough. UPDATE: 10/17/09. The Risks and Benefits of HPV Vaccination What your doctor or other health care provider is required to tell you by law, before you get a jab, ...
Jun 29, 2008
23 December, 2010: Natural Health News first reported on boys and Gardasil in 2006 and early in 2008. ... It found that Gardasil was 78% effective in preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasia related to the HPV-16 and HPV-18 viral serotypes. ...
Mar 22, 2009
Media Issues Propaganda To Boost HPV Vaccine Sales And Renewed Confidence Following Children's Deaths. UPDATE: ... http://naturalhealthnews.blogspot.com/2008/06/boys-now-targeted-by-big-pharmas.html ...
Jul 06, 2008
More evidence the Merck HPV vaccine is not ready for the public and no state funds should be used to provide access for this vaccine. 25-page report: ..... Kids are using diet pop in schools, in chewing gum, especially ...
Continue reading →

Heard it First on NHN - Gardasil for Boys

0 comments
Natural Health News has been convering Gardsil and the issue surrounding Gardsil for boys and men since 2006 and early in 2008.  You can be sure to get the first reports of real health and natural health news at Natural Health News, frequently copied, never duplicated.
 
 
ask us about remedies for vaccine concerns
 
Jun 30, 2006
Merck says that this vaccine, at $360 a series, will not have data on vaccination of little boys until 2008. Of course adding to the already heavy overlay of harmful vaccines will do little but raise money for Merck in the meantime. The Feds are also boosting profits by ... NVIC maintains that Merck's clinical trials did not prove the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine designed to prevent cervical cancer and genital warts is safe to give to young girls. ...

Some of our top stories about Gardasil -

Oct 16, 2009
Merck now targeting men with Gardasil, boys weren't enough. UPDATE: 10/17/09. The Risks and Benefits of HPV Vaccination What your doctor or other health care provider is required to tell you by law, before you get a jab, ...
Jun 29, 2008
23 December, 2010: Natural Health News first reported on boys and Gardasil in 2006 and early in 2008. ... It found that Gardasil was 78% effective in preventing anal intraepithelial neoplasia related to the HPV-16 and HPV-18 viral serotypes. ...
Mar 22, 2009
Media Issues Propaganda To Boost HPV Vaccine Sales And Renewed Confidence Following Children's Deaths. UPDATE: ... http://naturalhealthnews.blogspot.com/2008/06/boys-now-targeted-by-big-pharmas.html ...
Jul 06, 2008
More evidence the Merck HPV vaccine is not ready for the public and no state funds should be used to provide access for this vaccine. 25-page report: ..... Kids are using diet pop in schools, in chewing gum, especially ...
Continue reading →
Friday, September 16, 2011

What is being done to our children?

0 comments

Guess those professors, CBS evening News and Anderson cooper haven't been doing a thorough search of the literature

The Pourcyrous Study: Peer Reviewed study PROVES vaccines cause brain injury   from Tim O’Shea DC
For years I've been saying in the vaccine seminar and in my textbook on vaccines that this is just scratching the surface of the enormous body of research into Problems with Vaccines. At my recent lecture in Oxford England an attendee gave me a new book she has written about Shaken Baby Syndrome. In Catherine England's book I learned about the landmark Pourcyrous study on brain inflammation following vaccines. (Journal of Pediatrics 2007, vol 151, p 167) In a sample of 239 premature infants (less than 35 weeks) tests were done using two parameters for brain inflammation: C -reactive protein and evaluation of cardiopulmonary function. It was a very thorough study, University of Tennessee, differentiating the effects from a single vaccine vs. multiple vaccines given to these premature newborns. C-reactive protein is a blood value test, high levels of which indicate inflammation. No wonder the results were kept out of media: they were startling.
Among premies getting a single vaccine shot: 70% had elevated CRP ( C-reactive protein)
Premies who got multiple vaccines: 85% had high CRP. Fully 16% had cardiopulmonary events within 48 hours, including apnea and bradycardia.
In a premie, these effects are potentially fatal, of course.
Brain hemorrhages occurred in 17% of those with single vaccines, and in 24% getting multiple vaccines.
As expected, the most dangerous vaccine was DPT. Multiple vaccines included Hepatitis B, polio, DPT, H. influenzae, and Prevnar. Several things here. The recklessness in giving vaccines to premies isn't even discussed. Oh, so it’s for the sake of ‘science,’ so it’s OK, right? Of course there are no risk/benefit studies whatsoever in this area, but it stands to reason if a normal newborn takes at least 2 years to develop even a rudimentary immune system, how much more ill-advised it is to subject a premie who has no immune system at all as well as no blood brain barrier to an array of vaccines which contain neurotoxins such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol in addition to a host of manmade pathogens.
Knowing this alone, what kind of "scientist" would it take to even conduct a study like this in the first place on the fragile systems of premature infants? Sounds like something Dr. Mengele would come up with. 
One struggles for adjectives to describe this policy of vaccinating premies. But if these dangerous results are so high at this age, how much lower results could we expect just a few weeks later when they're at the usual age for getting multiple vaccines? What are we doing? What are scientists playing at?
How smart or how dumb do you have to be to realize how cavalier we're being with the most delicate medium in the universe: the infant's brain neurology? You can bet these geniuses aren't experimenting with their own children. 
Here's how the condescending conclusion of this searing study evaluates its own data on potentially lethal apnea and slowed heart beat: "In a minority of infants immunized, cardiorespiratory events were associated with presumed need for intervention". 
A minority? 17% is a pretty high minority especially if you're talking about the chances of your own infant dying from slowed heart rate and cessation of breathing! And for what?
The value of vaccines has never been clearly demonstrated, never proven in an independent controlled risk/benefit analysis. In other words, we don't know if they work or not. But we're positive they can kill babies. “Presumed need for intervention”? Like what? Drugs? Intensive care?
How about removing the root cause: just don’t vaccinate!
The next time your hear some mouthpiece recite the rote mantra about how there’s no proof vaccines cause brain injury, stop them in mid sentence with the Pourcyrous study - www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(07)00185-0/abstract  
As a parent, wouldn’t it be important to know that your child stands a 17% of a breathing crisis as the result of a vaccine? Or a 24% chance of brain hemorrhage with multiple vaccines, which multiples routinely begin at 2 months of age, with 7 vaccines on one day? I mean here’s the information from the best medical sources. Is the pediatrician going to tell the parents about these studies? Isn’t this level of danger worth knowing about?
What are we doing to our kids?
Continue reading →

What is being done to our children?

0 comments

Guess those professors, CBS evening News and Anderson cooper haven't been doing a thorough search of the literature

The Pourcyrous Study: Peer Reviewed study PROVES vaccines cause brain injury   from Tim O’Shea DC
For years I've been saying in the vaccine seminar and in my textbook on vaccines that this is just scratching the surface of the enormous body of research into Problems with Vaccines. At my recent lecture in Oxford England an attendee gave me a new book she has written about Shaken Baby Syndrome. In Catherine England's book I learned about the landmark Pourcyrous study on brain inflammation following vaccines. (Journal of Pediatrics 2007, vol 151, p 167) In a sample of 239 premature infants (less than 35 weeks) tests were done using two parameters for brain inflammation: C -reactive protein and evaluation of cardiopulmonary function. It was a very thorough study, University of Tennessee, differentiating the effects from a single vaccine vs. multiple vaccines given to these premature newborns. C-reactive protein is a blood value test, high levels of which indicate inflammation. No wonder the results were kept out of media: they were startling.
Among premies getting a single vaccine shot: 70% had elevated CRP ( C-reactive protein)
Premies who got multiple vaccines: 85% had high CRP. Fully 16% had cardiopulmonary events within 48 hours, including apnea and bradycardia.
In a premie, these effects are potentially fatal, of course.
Brain hemorrhages occurred in 17% of those with single vaccines, and in 24% getting multiple vaccines.
As expected, the most dangerous vaccine was DPT. Multiple vaccines included Hepatitis B, polio, DPT, H. influenzae, and Prevnar. Several things here. The recklessness in giving vaccines to premies isn't even discussed. Oh, so it’s for the sake of ‘science,’ so it’s OK, right? Of course there are no risk/benefit studies whatsoever in this area, but it stands to reason if a normal newborn takes at least 2 years to develop even a rudimentary immune system, how much more ill-advised it is to subject a premie who has no immune system at all as well as no blood brain barrier to an array of vaccines which contain neurotoxins such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, ethylene glycol in addition to a host of manmade pathogens.
Knowing this alone, what kind of "scientist" would it take to even conduct a study like this in the first place on the fragile systems of premature infants? Sounds like something Dr. Mengele would come up with. 
One struggles for adjectives to describe this policy of vaccinating premies. But if these dangerous results are so high at this age, how much lower results could we expect just a few weeks later when they're at the usual age for getting multiple vaccines? What are we doing? What are scientists playing at?
How smart or how dumb do you have to be to realize how cavalier we're being with the most delicate medium in the universe: the infant's brain neurology? You can bet these geniuses aren't experimenting with their own children. 
Here's how the condescending conclusion of this searing study evaluates its own data on potentially lethal apnea and slowed heart beat: "In a minority of infants immunized, cardiorespiratory events were associated with presumed need for intervention". 
A minority? 17% is a pretty high minority especially if you're talking about the chances of your own infant dying from slowed heart rate and cessation of breathing! And for what?
The value of vaccines has never been clearly demonstrated, never proven in an independent controlled risk/benefit analysis. In other words, we don't know if they work or not. But we're positive they can kill babies. “Presumed need for intervention”? Like what? Drugs? Intensive care?
How about removing the root cause: just don’t vaccinate!
The next time your hear some mouthpiece recite the rote mantra about how there’s no proof vaccines cause brain injury, stop them in mid sentence with the Pourcyrous study - www.jpeds.com/article/S0022-3476(07)00185-0/abstract  
As a parent, wouldn’t it be important to know that your child stands a 17% of a breathing crisis as the result of a vaccine? Or a 24% chance of brain hemorrhage with multiple vaccines, which multiples routinely begin at 2 months of age, with 7 vaccines on one day? I mean here’s the information from the best medical sources. Is the pediatrician going to tell the parents about these studies? Isn’t this level of danger worth knowing about?
What are we doing to our kids?
Continue reading →
Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Think You Know About Thimerisol?

0 comments
Natural Health News thanks our colleague, Tim Bolen, for this insightful article about Thimerisol.  Bolen notes that back in the 1930s the risk of this mercury (Hg) compound was of real concern.


Mercury is a deadly toxin - in any form.  Deadly to any living entity.  The product Thimerosal (Merthiolate) is a mercury-containing pharmaceutical compound that is 49.55% mercury.  It was developed in 1927.   More, unlike other forms of mercury, Thimerosal, is both water and fat soluble - meaning that it immediately penetrates into every part of the human body, and attaches itself wherever it wants.  When it is injected, as in vaccines, the human body's natural defense mechanisms that would work to catch and expel INGESTED forms of mercury, are completely bypassed allowing Thimerasol to quickly bind itself in places in the body we definitely DO NOT want it - like the brain.
Thimerosal has been marketed as an antimicrobial agent in a range of products, including topical antiseptic solutions and antiseptic ointments for treating cuts.  It was in nasal sprays, eye solutions, vaginal spermicides, and diaper rash treatments.  Perhaps most importantly it is used, even now, as a preservative in vaccines and other injectable biological products, including Rho(D)-immune globulin preparations. 
Despite evidence, dating to the early 1930s, indicating Thimerosal to be potentially hazardous to humans and ineffective as an antimicrobial agent it is still being used.
Crazy as it sounds, Thimerosal was not scrutinized as part of U.S. pharmaceutical products until the 1980s, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally recognized its demonstrated ineffectiveness and toxicity in topical pharmaceutical products, and began to eliminate it from these.   In 1998, finally, the US FDA took topically used (applied to the skin) Thimerosal products off of the market - as being too dangerous. 
Insane as it sounds, the US FDA didn't seem to have a problem with that same mercury being INJECTED directly into the human body - especially into our children.  Worse, Thimerosal continues to be administered, as part of mandated immunizations and other pharmaceutical products, in the United States, and globally.
Just to bring things up to date - let's look at the most recent Australian study on the relationship between Autism and mercury: Continue reading...
Continue reading →

Think You Know About Thimerisol?

0 comments
Natural Health News thanks our colleague, Tim Bolen, for this insightful article about Thimerisol.  Bolen notes that back in the 1930s the risk of this mercury (Hg) compound was of real concern.


Mercury is a deadly toxin - in any form.  Deadly to any living entity.  The product Thimerosal (Merthiolate) is a mercury-containing pharmaceutical compound that is 49.55% mercury.  It was developed in 1927.   More, unlike other forms of mercury, Thimerosal, is both water and fat soluble - meaning that it immediately penetrates into every part of the human body, and attaches itself wherever it wants.  When it is injected, as in vaccines, the human body's natural defense mechanisms that would work to catch and expel INGESTED forms of mercury, are completely bypassed allowing Thimerasol to quickly bind itself in places in the body we definitely DO NOT want it - like the brain.
Thimerosal has been marketed as an antimicrobial agent in a range of products, including topical antiseptic solutions and antiseptic ointments for treating cuts.  It was in nasal sprays, eye solutions, vaginal spermicides, and diaper rash treatments.  Perhaps most importantly it is used, even now, as a preservative in vaccines and other injectable biological products, including Rho(D)-immune globulin preparations. 
Despite evidence, dating to the early 1930s, indicating Thimerosal to be potentially hazardous to humans and ineffective as an antimicrobial agent it is still being used.
Crazy as it sounds, Thimerosal was not scrutinized as part of U.S. pharmaceutical products until the 1980s, when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally recognized its demonstrated ineffectiveness and toxicity in topical pharmaceutical products, and began to eliminate it from these.   In 1998, finally, the US FDA took topically used (applied to the skin) Thimerosal products off of the market - as being too dangerous. 
Insane as it sounds, the US FDA didn't seem to have a problem with that same mercury being INJECTED directly into the human body - especially into our children.  Worse, Thimerosal continues to be administered, as part of mandated immunizations and other pharmaceutical products, in the United States, and globally.
Just to bring things up to date - let's look at the most recent Australian study on the relationship between Autism and mercury: Continue reading...
Continue reading →
Saturday, August 6, 2011

Polysorbate 80 - One toxic ingredient in vaccines

0 comments
Pleased be informed.


You may request a copy of herbalYODA Says! on Informed Consent with your donation via PayPal.
By Daniel Dunkin

Polysorbate 80 in vaccines has become a controversial topic. When I worked in a food lab and as a mixologist in food production, we used Tween 80, (another name for Polysorbate 80), as an emulsifier to get flavoring oils to mix with water, and personally I never thought anything of it at the time. I did not suffer any ill effects from contact or from using it, however that was over 20 years ago and I never injected it into the skin.
According to the MSDS sheet at Science lab.com, section 11: Toxicological Information, it was tested for inhalation and ingestion and was shown to be slightly hazardous on skin contact, ingestion and inhalation. however these are minor compared to other potential side effects of it's use especially in an intravenous or immunologic setting. In the same section of toxicological information it states that it may cause reproductive effects, it may cause cancer, and may be a mutagenic, (change the genetics), in animals but this is followed up with the statement, no human data found. Well, unless they use people as lab rats, they won't find this data until it is used on humans to an extent to present this data.
According to PubMed.Gov a service of the U.S. Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health, a report shows that neonatal rats were injected with small doses of polysorbate 80 and the results were major effects on the reproductive organs of the rats, resulting in infertility. (see the PubMed link below). Considering this is a component of the Gardasil HPV vaccine, (not to mention other vaccines), and they are recommending this to girls at prepubescent ages, there should be some concern to any parent that this could possibly lead to infertility in your child.
Another research article at PubMed studied Polysorbate 80 in an intravenous vitamin mix given to a pregnant woman who suffered anaphylactic shock where polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent, and yet another study showed two patients who developed hypersensitive reactions to red blood cell growth hormones and subsequent skin testing indicated polysorbate 80 as the culprit. This finding might have implications in the recent increase in the incidence of pure red cell aplasia.
Polysorbate 80 in vaccines appears to be innocent when looking at the MSDS, but further digging reveals a possible hidden danger, especially a potential sterility to girls, and amplified because it is in all 3 Gardasil vaccines.

Polysorbate 80 in vaccines: a partial listing
Acel-Immune DTaP - diphtheria - tetanus - pertussis / Wyeth-Ayerst
FluShield / Wyeth-Ayerst
Gardasil - HPV / Merck
JE-VAX - Japanese encephalitis / Aventis Pasteur USA
TheraCys BCG - (intravesicle -not licensed in US for tuberculosis) / Aventis Pasteur USA
Tripedia - diphtheria - tetanus - pertussis / Aventis Pasteur USA
Resources:
Gardasil leaflet with Ingredients and Side Effects  http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_ppi.pdf

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to give medical advice. It is a call to educate yourself so that in making a decision where your child is concerned, you should take an active role in learning all you can from medical experts on both sides of the fence, then make an educated decision. we did not make an informed decision until one son got Leukemia and another developed Autism immediately after receiving his MMR vaccine. This has sent us on a quest to inform ourselves and others to seriously question what kind of toxic soups are being injected with the vaccines. Odds are if your child is injured by a vaccine, you have little or no recompense against the industry.
Vaccine Ingredients from Natural Health News



  
Continue reading →

Polysorbate 80 - One toxic ingredient in vaccines

0 comments
Pleased be informed.


You may request a copy of herbalYODA Says! on Informed Consent with your donation via PayPal.
By Daniel Dunkin

Polysorbate 80 in vaccines has become a controversial topic. When I worked in a food lab and as a mixologist in food production, we used Tween 80, (another name for Polysorbate 80), as an emulsifier to get flavoring oils to mix with water, and personally I never thought anything of it at the time. I did not suffer any ill effects from contact or from using it, however that was over 20 years ago and I never injected it into the skin.
According to the MSDS sheet at Science lab.com, section 11: Toxicological Information, it was tested for inhalation and ingestion and was shown to be slightly hazardous on skin contact, ingestion and inhalation. however these are minor compared to other potential side effects of it's use especially in an intravenous or immunologic setting. In the same section of toxicological information it states that it may cause reproductive effects, it may cause cancer, and may be a mutagenic, (change the genetics), in animals but this is followed up with the statement, no human data found. Well, unless they use people as lab rats, they won't find this data until it is used on humans to an extent to present this data.
According to PubMed.Gov a service of the U.S. Library of Medicine and the National Institute of Health, a report shows that neonatal rats were injected with small doses of polysorbate 80 and the results were major effects on the reproductive organs of the rats, resulting in infertility. (see the PubMed link below). Considering this is a component of the Gardasil HPV vaccine, (not to mention other vaccines), and they are recommending this to girls at prepubescent ages, there should be some concern to any parent that this could possibly lead to infertility in your child.
Another research article at PubMed studied Polysorbate 80 in an intravenous vitamin mix given to a pregnant woman who suffered anaphylactic shock where polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent, and yet another study showed two patients who developed hypersensitive reactions to red blood cell growth hormones and subsequent skin testing indicated polysorbate 80 as the culprit. This finding might have implications in the recent increase in the incidence of pure red cell aplasia.
Polysorbate 80 in vaccines appears to be innocent when looking at the MSDS, but further digging reveals a possible hidden danger, especially a potential sterility to girls, and amplified because it is in all 3 Gardasil vaccines.

Polysorbate 80 in vaccines: a partial listing
Acel-Immune DTaP - diphtheria - tetanus - pertussis / Wyeth-Ayerst
FluShield / Wyeth-Ayerst
Gardasil - HPV / Merck
JE-VAX - Japanese encephalitis / Aventis Pasteur USA
TheraCys BCG - (intravesicle -not licensed in US for tuberculosis) / Aventis Pasteur USA
Tripedia - diphtheria - tetanus - pertussis / Aventis Pasteur USA
Resources:
Gardasil leaflet with Ingredients and Side Effects  http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/g/gardasil/gardasil_ppi.pdf

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to give medical advice. It is a call to educate yourself so that in making a decision where your child is concerned, you should take an active role in learning all you can from medical experts on both sides of the fence, then make an educated decision. we did not make an informed decision until one son got Leukemia and another developed Autism immediately after receiving his MMR vaccine. This has sent us on a quest to inform ourselves and others to seriously question what kind of toxic soups are being injected with the vaccines. Odds are if your child is injured by a vaccine, you have little or no recompense against the industry.
Vaccine Ingredients from Natural Health News



  
Continue reading →
Monday, July 11, 2011

Anthrax Experiment: HHS, CDC New Attack on Children

0 comments
You may want the latest information on this new experiment using anthrax vaccine (unproven) on your children.
Alliance for Human Research Protection
A Catalyst for Debate
www.ahrp.org
The National Biodefense Science Board, convened a two day meeting of the Anthrax Vaccine Working Group at the request of the Department of Health and Human Services (July 7 and 8). The July 7 meeting was open to the public: the July 8 meeting was closed.
The Alliance for Human Research Protection took the lead in speaking out against this medical travesty. This US government-proposed anthrax vaccine experiment would expose children to a controversial vaccine whose efficacy is unproven but whose risks of harm are serious and even life-threatening.
The FDA-approved label for ANTHRAX VACCINE ADSORBED (BIOTHRAX™) 31 JAN 2002 states:
"Approximately 6% of the reported events were listed as serious. Serious adverse events include those that result in death, hospitalization, permanent disability or are life-threatening. The serious adverse events most frequently reported were in the following body system categories: general disorders and administration site conditions, nervous system disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and musculoskeletal, connective tissue and bone disorders. Anaphylaxis and/or other generalized hypersensitivity reactions, as well as serious local reactions, were reported to occur occasionally following administration of BioThrax. None of these hypersensitivity reactions have been fatal.
Other infrequently reported serious adverse events that have occurred in persons who have received BioThrax have included: cellulitis, cysts, pemphigus vulgaris, endocarditis, sepsis, angioedema and other hypersensitivity reactions, asthma, aplastic anemia, neutropenia, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, lymphoma, leukemia, collagen vascular disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, polyarteritis nodosa, inflammatory arthritis, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, immune deficiency, seizure, mental status changes, psychiatric disorders, tremors, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), facial palsy, hearing and visual disorders, aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, syncope, glomerulonephritis, renal failure, spontaneous abortion and liver abscess. Infrequent reports were also received of multisystem disorders defined as chronic symptoms involving at least two of the following three categories: fatigue, mood-cognition, musculoskeletal system.

Reports of fatalities included sudden cardiac arrest (2), myocardial infarction with polyarteritis nodosa (1), aplastic anemia (1), suicide (1) and central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (1)."
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/05n-0040-bkg0001.pdf 
Under US law, an experiment that exposes children to greater than minimal risk is unethical and illegal. The proposed experiment would sacrifice children's welfare, much as canaries sent into the coal mines were sacrificed.
Read the written two-minute allotted public comments submitted by AHRP board members, Meryl Nass, MD and Vera Hassner Sharav. http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/827/9/  

Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav
veracare@ahrp.org  212-595-8974

selection from Natural Health News Vaccine Vacillations

Oct 02, 2007
BioThrax - Anthrax Adsorbed BioPort Corporation 517.327.1500 * nonencapsulated strain of Bacillus anthracis aluminum hydroxide, benzethonium chloride, and formaldehyde. DPT - Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis GlaxoSmithKline 800.366.8900 ...
Continue reading →

Anthrax Experiment: HHS, CDC New Attack on Children

0 comments
You may want the latest information on this new experiment using anthrax vaccine (unproven) on your children.
Alliance for Human Research Protection
A Catalyst for Debate
www.ahrp.org
The National Biodefense Science Board, convened a two day meeting of the Anthrax Vaccine Working Group at the request of the Department of Health and Human Services (July 7 and 8). The July 7 meeting was open to the public: the July 8 meeting was closed.
The Alliance for Human Research Protection took the lead in speaking out against this medical travesty. This US government-proposed anthrax vaccine experiment would expose children to a controversial vaccine whose efficacy is unproven but whose risks of harm are serious and even life-threatening.
The FDA-approved label for ANTHRAX VACCINE ADSORBED (BIOTHRAX™) 31 JAN 2002 states:
"Approximately 6% of the reported events were listed as serious. Serious adverse events include those that result in death, hospitalization, permanent disability or are life-threatening. The serious adverse events most frequently reported were in the following body system categories: general disorders and administration site conditions, nervous system disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and musculoskeletal, connective tissue and bone disorders. Anaphylaxis and/or other generalized hypersensitivity reactions, as well as serious local reactions, were reported to occur occasionally following administration of BioThrax. None of these hypersensitivity reactions have been fatal.
Other infrequently reported serious adverse events that have occurred in persons who have received BioThrax have included: cellulitis, cysts, pemphigus vulgaris, endocarditis, sepsis, angioedema and other hypersensitivity reactions, asthma, aplastic anemia, neutropenia, idiopathic thrombocytopenia purpura, lymphoma, leukemia, collagen vascular disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, polyarteritis nodosa, inflammatory arthritis, transverse myelitis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, immune deficiency, seizure, mental status changes, psychiatric disorders, tremors, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), facial palsy, hearing and visual disorders, aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, syncope, glomerulonephritis, renal failure, spontaneous abortion and liver abscess. Infrequent reports were also received of multisystem disorders defined as chronic symptoms involving at least two of the following three categories: fatigue, mood-cognition, musculoskeletal system.

Reports of fatalities included sudden cardiac arrest (2), myocardial infarction with polyarteritis nodosa (1), aplastic anemia (1), suicide (1) and central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (1)."
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/05n-0040-bkg0001.pdf 
Under US law, an experiment that exposes children to greater than minimal risk is unethical and illegal. The proposed experiment would sacrifice children's welfare, much as canaries sent into the coal mines were sacrificed.
Read the written two-minute allotted public comments submitted by AHRP board members, Meryl Nass, MD and Vera Hassner Sharav. http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/827/9/  

Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav
veracare@ahrp.org  212-595-8974

selection from Natural Health News Vaccine Vacillations

Oct 02, 2007
BioThrax - Anthrax Adsorbed BioPort Corporation 517.327.1500 * nonencapsulated strain of Bacillus anthracis aluminum hydroxide, benzethonium chloride, and formaldehyde. DPT - Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis GlaxoSmithKline 800.366.8900 ...
Continue reading →
Friday, April 15, 2011

Foundation Activities, Vaccines and more...

0 comments
These are the largest private global health foundations exerting inordinate influence on public health policy--those policies favor Big Pharma and their own corporate interests and endowment portfolios.
Global Health Philanthropy and Institutional Relationships: How Should Conflicts of Interest Be Addressed?  by David Stuckler, Sanjay Basu, and Martin McKee, is a groundbreaking article in PLoS Medicine, illuminating the shadows that blur major conflicts of interest in the public health arena.

The article lifts the veil that hides an intricate web of direct and, more importantly, the indirect interconnected financial ties between private, tax-exempt foundations that are major funders of global health, and commercial corporations. Such relationships cannot but influence a foundation's agenda and funding decisions.
  
By "following the money," the authors found that "despite the existence of policies explicitly designed to mitigate potential conflicts of interest, the boundaries between foundations, their investments, and their parent corporations or private funders can become blurred. Often, directors of the boards of foundations also sit on the board of private corporations,
adopting multiple roles."

The authors  conducted a case study using data about the networks, activities, and funding patterns of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Ford Foundation, W. K. Kellogg Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and Rockefeller Foundation.

These are the largest private global health foundations exerting inordinate influence on public health policy--those policies favor Big Pharma and their own corporate interests and endowment portfolios.

Read more... http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/799/9/

Stay tuned for a follow-up about a controversy involving a Gates Foundation-supported project--a market expansion strategy for increasing profits for vaccine manufacturers...

Jan 29, 2010
The depopulation plan is supported by the world's wealthiest people, including Bill Gates, who admittedly funds vaccinations to reduce global populations by 10-15%. Leading population planners and economic developers advance identical ...
Oct 11, 2007
Research into a vaccine for AIDS, which is devastating in parts of southern Africa, got a boost following a 100 million dollar (70.6 million euro) initiative launched by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. ...
Feb 11, 2011
PLEASE remember this when you are listening to Bill Gates' current PR spots for vaccines. Gates has publicly stated that vaccines are good for population control. In 1926 the AMA announced it was aware of neurological damage caused by ...
Nov 03, 2008
Bill Gates' foundation recently awarded a grant to a Japanese scientist who hopes to engage mosquitoes in the vaccination of everyone. When I read the story about these awards I wondered what kind of a crazy idea this is, because just ...

Continue reading →

Labels